|
Defining the Leadership
Challenge Today
he leaders of today are faced
with many challenges, which are often rooted in the rapidly changing
environment. Leaders have to focus their energy on at least the following
three key areas at the same time:
Action Centered Leadership
These three areas are interrelated,
and an effective leader should maintain balance between them and share
power and responsibility with subordinates. The effectiveness of a leader
depends also on his ability to influence and be influenced by the group
and its members in the implementation of common tasks. This means in
relation to the above model:
The above model can be likened
to an iceberg. Leaders often focus on the management of tasks
and leave the team and individual development to itself. In this case
the only aspect of the job visible above the surface is the task management.
It is possible to shift the iceberg by dragging it along at the surface
but it takes a great deal of energy. The leader who attends to all three
areas will be pulling from the center of gravity beneath the surface.
This is far more efficient and the iceberg appears to move by itself.
A key word in the model is balance.
It is unusual for a leader to attend to all three areas at once. However,
as long as each area is visited at the appropriate times balance is
maintained. If one area grows out of proportion to the others the iceberg
will either sink or capsize as the neglected needs begin to dominate,
hindering performance.
The model shows the three circles
overlapping. This is to indicate that each area is inter-related.
To be effective a team needs a certain spirit and targets at which to
aim in order to get the task achieved. At the same time each member
has needs and ambitions they want to meet, skills to contribute to the
task and a desire to be an active member of the team.
Whatever the level of management
the effective leader will satisfy
-
the task: by
clear, brief and achievable targets; good planning and organization;
constant monitoring and control as appropriate (MBWA – ‘Management
by Wandering About,’ i.e., walking around and inquiring with staff/getting
their feedback); and realistic and specific evaluation and feedback.
Styles of Leadership and
Influence
Autocratic Styles
-
TELL – Exerting pressure,
using rewards or punishment to get action. Being directive.
-
SELL – Putting forward
a reasoned case (selling), or making a personal appeal (do me a
favor). Persuading.
-
Coach – Training, showing
or telling someone "how to…".
-
CONSULT – Asking for suggestions
and information before deciding on action.
-
BARGAIN – Agreeing on
ways you can help each other. Giving and taking.
-
JOINT Problem-Solve –
Working things out together as a team. Discussing problems and solutions.
-
FACILITATE – Listening
to the ideas of others and/or help a person to solve the problem
himself.
-
DELEGATE – Assigning a
task including the quality, quantity, and time scale. Allowing scope
in how to do the task.
-
AVOIDANCE – Refusing to
get involved, leaving the person on his/her own.
Participating Styles
Personal
Characteristics in Developing Power and Influence
hat makes a leader? The question
raises speculation as to whether there is a single trait or personality
characteristic that distinguishes a leader from a non-leader. The answer
is that while there is no such single trait, there are some universal
traits that leaders have to some greater degree than non-leaders. What
is certainly true is that one cannot ignore the situation and the followers
when trying to clarify what makes a leader or to explain leadership.
Power and influence can be developed
by a series of strategies and tactics. The ability to choose the most
appropriate influencing style and develop a repertoire of influencing
skills is of great importance for leaders who want to increase their
sphere of influence. However, research has also shown that a number
of personal characteristics are associated with those who acquire power
within organizations. The main personal characteristics in developing
power and influence include the following:
Personal Energy
In his book On Leadership
(The Free Press, 1989) John W. Gardner wrote: "If one asks people to
list the attributes of leaders, they are not likely to mention a high
energy level or physical durability. Yet these attributes are essential."
Energy and resilience are some
of the important elements in building power. They allow one to outpace
and outlast other players, and they also act as a motivational role
model for those who may work for someone. Working hard and for long
hours can signal to others that the job is important.
Of course, there are also risks
in using high energy and long working hours as a way of leading. It
can fail to take account of life outside of work and the various claims
on our personal time and energy. At extremes, the result can be stress
for the individual and a work environment that cultivates a culture
of long work hours, rather than effectiveness.
Focus
People who exercise great influence
tend to focus their energies. The analogy is the science experiment
in which a magnifying glass is used to focus the sun's rays, causing
dry grass to catch fire. By focusing the sun's rays we can make them
much stronger.
In one study of successful general
managers it was found that the majority tended to concentrate their
careers in one industry and one company. It prevented their energy being
diverted and attention was focused on a narrower set of concerns and
problems. It also provided greater opportunity to develop a wide range
of contacts and power bases upon which to leverage power.
In contrast many people still
enter into important discussions, meetings and negotiations with no
clear idea of what they want to achieve as an outcome. This makes it
far more difficult for them to resist the influence of those people
who know exactly what they want and where they are going. They are able
to put all their energies into achieving these specific goals and therefore
concentrate their influence and so increase the likelihood of success.
Sensitivity to Others
When trying to influence others
it is useful to be able to understand the people concerned, i.e., know
their interests and attitudes. Sensitivity refers to the ability to
understand others, their position on the issues, how best to communicate
with and influence them. It is necessary to be able to read others’
behavior so that their reactions and levels of resistance or support
can be understood.
It inherently involves a willingness
to put oneself in the other person’s shoes and to acknowledge that he/she
may be different in their views, approach and style of doing things.
One needs to take an interest in others and especially be able to listen
to what others say or what they do not say. Ironically, the ability
to understand what others want has a major impact on achieving one’s
own personal goals.
Flexibility
The benefits of sensitivity
are severely limited unless they are accompanied by the ability to modify
behavior in light of what is understood about others. Flexibility allows
leaders to change course and adapt new approaches rather than sticking
with tactics that are failing. Whilst maintaining focus on the final
goal, flexible leaders are able to take on board new information, adapt
their styles and look for new ways to achieve the desired outcome. It
is also an approach, which is more likely to build allies, as it shows
a willingness to accommodate others’ views.
The absence of flexibility can
lead to a rigid pursuit of personal goals and to the exclusion of all
others. This may win few supporters and lead to an almost obsessive
need to win at all costs. It can develop into a win-lose strategy, which
is a dangerous game to play.
Ability to Tolerate Conflict
The reality of the organizational
world is that we operate in an environment in which we come across disagreement,
confrontation and conflict. The source of conflict may vary, as may
the style in which it is expressed, yet it appears that today’s leaders
need to exercise power in situations where there is conflict.
In fact, the pressure on our
influencing skills are greatest in conflict situations. If there is
no disagreement there will be little or no requirement to exercise power
and influence. Where there is disagreement there needs to be willingness
to engage in conflict.
Yet this can be far from simple
to accomplish. For many people, conflict is a source of stress, something
to be avoided at all costs. To avoid stress some people will go along
with a view that they do not hold, or they will avoid bringing conflict
out into the open, hoping that by ignoring it, it will disappear. If
there is a strong need to be liked by others, engaging in conflict can
be tough. Yet, to exercise power effectively, one often needs the independence
to accept that we are unlikely to be able to "please all the people
all of the time."
Being a Team Player
It is important to recognize
the times when there is a need to fight, to be difficult and to push
certain views. It is also vital to be able to make friends, build bridges
and develop a network of contacts throughout the organization. Those
who are able to develop power are able to change their behavior according
to the needs and mood of the situation.
It is important to be able to
get along with others, even when this means working with those with
whom we may have little in common or whose views we have little time
for. It means talking and listening to a wide range of people and gaining
acceptance as one of the team.
Support may come from many places
in an organization and it may come today, tomorrow or next year. The
leader who wants to develop greater influence does not stand aloof,
but works at gaining acceptance from others. Being accessible, helpful
and learning the language of the team is an important way to build support
for today, tomorrow and the years to come. This may mean putting their
own personal feelings and liking to one side in order to work with others,
but it is also a vital part of building the broad support needed for
the effective leader.
Reputation, Trust and
Credibility
The personal characteristics
identified with those who have influence in organizations need to be
seen as an integrated profile. Any trait needs to be counter-balanced
by others. In the shorter term it may be possible to get one’s views
accepted by pushing them through without too much consideration of others.
However, in the longer term it is vital for the influential leader to
develop credibility in the organization. Credibility may be based on
many things, e.g., technical know-how, knowledge of the markets, personal
integrity, and/or having a reputation for getting things done.
Influence is far simpler and
more effective where there are good, strong working relationships, and
where trust has been built between those involved. It is an investment
that must be made to develop power.
Effective
Communication
The communication process is
about a message transferred from a sender to a receiver through a certain
channel. The message should be understood by the receiver in the same
manner as the sender intended it to be, especially since during the
transfer of the message, various filters may cause the distortion of
the original meaning. As result, the intended communication does not
match the actual reception. This is why feedback on a continuous basis
is essential.
message
Sender Receiver
feedback
Messages can be send by various
means, such as through words, music or tone, or body language. Research
has shown that words are actually the least important element in delivering
a message, music comes second, while body language is the far most important
element in the communication process.
Among the filters that can distort
an intended communication process are the following:
-
Selective perception:
people tend to interpret what they see on the basis of their interest,
attitudes and experience.
-
Horn and Halo effects:
the receiver perceives the sender as a devil (horn) or as an angel
(halo).
-
Stereotyping: individuals
are judged on the basis of one’s perception, e.g., in terms of what
group he/she belongs to, causing a bias.
-
Projection: judging
others assuming that they are similar to oneself.
Learning to Listen
As a receiver one should:
L Look
Interested
I
Inquire with questions
S Stay
on target
T Test
your understanding
E Evaluate
the message
N Neutralize
feelings
Ten Commandments for Good
Listening
-
Stop talking!
You cannot listen if you are
talking.
Polonius (Hamlet): Give every
man thine (both) ear, but few thy (single) voice.
-
Put the Talker at Ease.
Help the talker feel free
to talk. (This is often called a permissive environment)
-
Show the Talker that you
want to Listen
Look and act interested. Do
not read your mail while he or she talks. Listen to understand rather
than to oppose.
-
Remove Distractions.
Don’t doodle, tap, or shuffle
papers. Will it be quieter if you shut the door?
-
Empathize with the Talker.
Try to put yourself in the
talker’s place so that you can see his or her point of view.
-
Be Patient.
Allow plenty of time. Do not
interrupt the talker. Do not start for the door or walk away.
-
Hold your Temper
An angry person gets the wrong
meaning from words.
-
Go easy on Argument and
Criticism.
This puts the talker on the
defensive. He or she may ‘clam up’ or get angry. Do not argue: even
if you win, you lose.
-
Ask Questions.
This encourages the talker
and shows you are listening. It helps to develop points further.
-
Stop Talking!
This is first and last, because
all other commandments depend on it. You just cannot do a good listening
job while you are talking.
Nature gives us two ears
but only one tongue, which is a gentle hint that we should listen
more than we talk.
Empowering Others
It is part of the human nature
that people work well together when they agree with one another and
share in the task of setting and achieving the objectives of the whole
team. One of the best ways to ensure that people agree on objectives
and are motivated to achieve them is to make sure that they take part
in setting them. To empower people does not mean to loose face or power,
the contrary is true.
If one wants to know the opinion
of others, he should let them talk without trying to influence them
or being defensive. Others should not rely on you for answers; instead,
when someone approaches you for an answer or a decision, ask first what
he or she thinks. Using this technique does not mean that
you do not have an opinion or are abdicating your leadership role, it
means that you are encouraging others to solve their own problems. You
are empowering them to take on some of the leadership role.
Listening and Rapport
Building
A very important element in
any communication process is an attitude of respect for the other. Respect
and interest can be demonstrated by verbal and non-verbal means. Non-verbal
signals include the following:
-
Eye Contact
-
Facial expressions
-
Postures
-
Nodding
General encouragement
can be shown by expression such as:
-
UN-huh
-
" That's interesting"
-
" Tell me more"
-
" Give me an example"
The occurrence of matching
(i.e., appearing to be on the same wave-length) is usually indicated
by:
Asking Questions
Whether during communication,
in a problem-solving situation or a decision-making process, an effective
leader should always ask questions.
Types of Question
There are two main types of
questions: open and closed ones. Open questions will help you to gain
lots of information, while closed questions illicit a "yes/no" type
of answer and are basically useful for controlling conversations and
for establishing specific facts.
-
Open questions begin with
key words such as: what?, where?, why?, when?, who?, how?
(NB: one should
be careful not to ask too many questions beginning with "why?"
as this may end up sounding like an interrogation!).
-
Closed questions begin
with a part of the verb such as: "Did you…?", "Do you…?", "Have
you…?", "Are you...?"
An effective leader knows how
to use the two types according to the situation and according to the
purpose of the question (i.e., for inquiring, obtaining information,
clarifying matters, or confirming details, etc.). If open and closed
questions are used knowingly, one can both gather information and control
conversations effectively.
The following questions should
also be used sparingly:
- Leading questions, e.g.:
"You have improved in that area now, haven't you?"
à
may simply prompt the other person to give the answer they think you
want to hear.
- Implied value, e.g.:
"Surely you'd agree with me that effective selling skills are far
more important than effective presentation skills?"
à
may simply prompt a "yes"-answer because the other person is too afraid
to disagree!
à
does not give the counterpart a chance to reply
à
confuses the other person
à
does not really await an answer; is more of a veiled attack on the
other person (e.g., his ability)
à
the first part is more of a statement that does not really provide
the other person with the ‘right to reply.’
Handling
Tasks
very leader aims to achieve
a preset goal in order to achieve a certain task. In order to achieve
goals a clear plan is needed as is a classification of the required
tasks in order to be able to set priorities. This is because some tasks
are urgent, some are important and some are both, while others are neither.
In the following these points will be discussed in detail.
Objectives and Priorities
-
You cannot do an
objective or goal. You achieve your objectives by doing tasks or
activities.
-
Activities which help
you achieve your goals are effective. Methods which reduce the cost
or time of tasks are efficient.
-
Organizing work and time
is mainly about being more effective; e.g., completing a course
or meeting on time or ahead of time is not necessarily effective.
-
A "progress" task is one
which you believe may move you towards a position which is fundamentally
better than the one you are in now, i.e., closer to your objectives.
-
A "maintenance" task is
one which you know will move you towards a position equivalent to
one you have been in before, e.g., filling up with petrol.
-
Urgent tasks are those
which require or seem to require immediate attention (because the
benefit will be lost otherwise, because of deadlines, because the
boss says so).
-
Important tasks have a
high pay-off, but may not be urgent.
-
You need to be aware of
how your time is currently being spent in relation to important,
urgent, maintenance and progress tasks.
-
You may need to take action
to make time for these tasks if they are being neglected.
-
This may mean reducing
interruptions, arranging quiet time, saying "no," renegotiating
priorities with your boss.
Priorities
Priority setting is not always
an easy task. The following exercise will demonstrate this:
Exercise:
Make some notes in the
grid below in answer to the following questions:
A Imagine that you
could only spend two days per week on your present job for health
reasons but you were able within that time to undertake anything
you do now. Which tasks and objectives would you concentrate on
and why?
B Imagine you only
had six months left to live. How would you alter the way you spend
your personal time and why?
What would I….
| |
Stop
|
Do less of
|
Do more of
|
Start
|
|
A
W
O
R
K
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
|
|
|
|
|
Time Management
The Time Management Matrix
("Put first things first")
| |
URGENT
|
NOT URGENT
|
|
Important
|
I
ACTIVITIES
- Crises
- Pressing problems
- Deadline - driven projects
|
II
ACTIVITIES
- Prevention, PC activities
- Relationship building
- Recognizing new opportunities
- Planning, recreation
|
|
Not Important
|
III
ACTIVITIES
- Interruptions, some calls
- Some mail, some reports
- Some meetings
- Proximate, pressing matters
- Popular activities
|
IV
ACTIVITIES
- Trivia, busy work
- Some mail
- Some phone calls
- Time wasters
- Pleasant activities
|
Problem
Solving
Below follows the description
of a situation and a problem, which the participants are required to
read. In the first step, they are then asked to try to solve the problem
individually, and in the second step, to solve it in a team. The outcome
of this exercise will show how the very same problem is solved individually
(one input) and as a team (several inputs), which methods are used in
either case, and which is the better way to operate.
The problem situation described
below is based on actual cases, in which men and women lived or died,
depending upon the survival decisions they made. Your life or death
will depend upon how well your group can share its present knowledge
of a relative unfamiliar problem, so that the group can make decisions,
which will lead to your survival.
Exercise: Wilderness
Survival
The Situation
It is approximately 2.30 p.m.,
October 5th and you have just crash-landed in a float plan
on the east shore of Laura lake in the sub-arctic region of the northern
Quebec-Newfoundland border. The pilot was killed in the crash, but
the rest of you are uninjured. Each of you is wet up to the waist
and has perspired heavily. Shortly after the crash, the plane drifted
into deep water and sank with the pilot’s body pinned inside.
The pilot was unable to make
contact before the crash. However, ground sightings indicated that
you are 30 miles off your intended course and approx. 22 air miles
east of Schefferville, your original destination, and the nearest
known habitation (population 5,000). Schefferville, an iron ore mining
town, is some 300 air miles north of the St. Lawrence, 450 miles east
of the James Bay/Hudson Bay area, 800 miles south of the Arctic Circle
and 300 miles west of the Atlantic Coast. It is reachable only by
air or rail, all roads ending a few miles from the town. Your party
was expected to return from northwestern Labrador to Schefferville
no later than October 19th and filed a Flight Notification
Form with the Department of Transportation via Schefferville radio
to the effect.
The immediate area is covered
with small evergreen trees (1.5-4 inches in diameter). Scattered in
the area are a number of hills that have rocky and barren tops. Tundra
(arctic swamps) make up the valleys between the hills and consist
of only small shrubs. Approx. 25 percent of the area in this region
is covered by long narrow lakes, which run northwest to southwest.
Innumerable streams and rivers flow into and connect the lakes.
Temperatures during October
vary between 25 degrees F. and 36 degrees F., although it will occasionally
go as high as 50 degrees F. and as low as 0 degrees F. Heavy clouds
cover the sky three quarters of the time, with only one day in ten
being fairly clear. Some 5-7 inches of snow are on the ground; however,
the actual depth varies enormously because the wind sweeps the exposed
areas clear and builds drifts 3-5 inches deep in other areas. The
wind speed averages 5-13 miles per hour and is mostly out of the west-northwest.
You are all dressed in insulated
underwear, socks, heavy wool shirts, trousers, knit gloves, sheepskin
jackets, knitted wool caps and heavy leather hunting boots. Collectively,
your personal possessions include £153 in notes, a pocketknife (two
blades and an awl which resembles an ice pick), a lead pencil and
air map.
The Problem
Before the plane drifted away
and sank, you were able to salvage the 15 items listed in the table.
Your task is to rank these items according to their importance.
You may assume:
-
the number of survivors
is the same as the number in your team
-
you are the actual people
in the situation
-
the team has agreed to
stick together
-
all items are dry and
in good condition.
Step One: Individually,
without discussing the situation or the items with anyone else
rank each item according to how important it is to your survival.
Step Two: After
everyone has finished the individual ranking, rank-order the
15 items as a team.
WILDERNESS SURVIVAL RANKING
SHEET
|
ITEMS
|
Step One
Individual Ranking
|
Step Two
The Group’s Ranking
|
Step Three
Survival Experts’
Ranking
|
Step Four
Difference Between
Steps 1 & 3
|
Step Five
Difference Between
Steps 2 & 3
|
|
MATCHES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYLON ROPE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RUM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INNER TUBE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 X 20 Tarp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AXE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIRROR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STAR NAVIGATION BOOK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PURITABS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALARM CLOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYRUP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SLEEPING BAGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLASHLIGHT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNOWSHOES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPASS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TOTAL (the lower the
score the better)
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL SCORE TEAM SCORE
After filling in the Wilderness
Survival Ranking Sheet, the participants were given the following process
analysis paper to evaluate the exercise and state in which manner they
have benefited from it.
Process Analysis
Please mark your level of agreement
or disagreement with the statements below:
|
No
|
Statements
|
DISAGREE
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGREE
|
|
1
|
We clearly understood what we were
trying to achieve.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
2
|
All the team ideas were discussed
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
3
|
Team members helped and supported
each other.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
4
|
I listened when others were speaking.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
5
|
The others listened when I was speaking
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
My skills and experience were utilized
by the team
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
7
|
Other skills and experience were
utilized by the team.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
8
|
There was a high degree of interest
in the problem
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
9
|
Some people dominated the team
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
10
|
There was a genuine desire to work
together
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Decision-Making
As part of the problem-solving
process decisions must be made, the goal being to decide as rational
as possible as decision affect lives, the course of an organization,
policies, etc. This is not always an easy task, sometimes decision have
to be made alone, sometimes together with others, and sometimes under
pressure. The decision-making process itself can employ a wide range
of methods, the efficiency of which often depends on the given context
and circumstances. The main decision-making methods are described in
the following:
-
The Boss Decides:
The leader makes the decisions without consulting the group in any
way.
-
The Expert Decides:
The group selects an expert inside or outside its members, lets
him consider the issues, and has him tell the group what to do.
The group does not discuss the issue, but leaves it to the expert.
-
Average of Individuals'
Opinions: The boss asks each member of the group for his opinion,
and then chooses the most frequent response, or what he/she feels
will on average satisfy the group's desires.
-
Group Meeting, then
Boss Decides: A group meeting is called and the issue discussed
until the leader feels sure in his/her own mind what the right decision
should be, and then announces it to the group.
-
Postpone it and Hope:
The issue is avoided and postponed indefinitely, in the hope that
if it is avoided long enough, no decision will be needed.
-
Leave it to Chance:
Choose a random event to make the decision for the group, e.g.,
rolling a dice, flipping a coin, or seeing which applicant phones
first, etc.
-
Majority Rule:
The group discusses the issue until at least 51% of the members
agree on one option and then a vote is taken and the decision made.
-
Minority Rules, Ok?:
Two or more members of the group, who constitute less than half
of it, make the decision with or without the group's consent.
-
Consensus: A group
decision is reached, either with perfect agreement, or more often
when everyone feels they have had a fair chance to influence the
decision, and feels some commitment to it.
Problems arise constantly; an
effective leader must be able to take care of the problems and try to
solve them in a process-oriented way. The following exercise is designed
to measure the ability of people to work within a team and to solve
problems from a team perspective.
Enabling Exercise:
Team Assignment
A reorganization of your group
is being considered. For now, please get into an initial position. Each
person should choose a position in the row of spaces marked on the floor
so that:
-
The central space is empty
-
Each of the other spaces
is occupied by one person
-
Everyone is facing inwards
towards the empty space.
Write your names or initials
in the diagram below, so that you will have a record of your original
assigned location
Instructions: Your task
is to "re-align" the people in you team.
The Task: You need to
get the people in your team into new locations. Doing this will require
getting people who are currently standing in one pattern moved to another
pattern, according to certain rules. The current pattern has people
standing in a row facing each other across an empty space, like this:
The desired pattern has each
set of people standing in the same order, but on opposite sides of the
empty space, facing outward, like this:
The Rules:
- You may relocate as many people as you
want, in a single move, so long as they all move in the same direction
- People may be relocated only into an
empty space.
- No space may contain more than one person
at any time.
- Each person must remain facing the same
direction and may move only in that direction, no backward moves
are allowed.
- No one may move more than two spaces
at a time. That is, you can relocate someone into adjacent empty
space, or "jump" around one person into an empty space.
Systematic Approach to
Planning and Problem Solving
Problems cannot be solved randomly;
whoever is faced with having to solve a problem should use a systematic
and rational approach that consists of several steps, which should be
considered as flexible (i.e., one can move from one step to the other
and go back to the previous without any friction). The following steps
should be part of the problem solving process:
Define objective - clarify
the task or problem
- specify the
aim of objective to be achieved
- ensure understanding
and commitment
Collect information - collect
and organize data
- check facts
and opinions
- consider available
resources
- clarify parameters
(time, budget)
Develop options - encourage
ideas and contribution
- list possible
courses of action
Evaluate / decide - list
pros and cons
- examine consequences
- measure them
against objectives
- choose an option
Implement - act to
carry out the decision
- allocate tasks
and delegate responsibility
- set quality
standards, targets and deadlines
Monitor / control - monitor
performance/results against targets
- take account
of new circumstances
- adjust plans if
required
Review - examine results
promptly and objectively
- learn from the experience
Communicate -
involve others and listen to their views at
every stage
- make decisions
and targets always clear
- always encourage
feedback
Effective
Meetings
It most basic, a meeting is
a ‘getting together’ for a particular purpose such as sharing information,
solving problems or making decisions.
For the initiator of a meeting
the main role is to ensure that the meeting achieves results. To ensure
success the following skills for managing the five key steps of effective
meetings are needed:
-
Preparation before the
meeting
-
Opening the meeting
-
Running the meeting
-
Closing the meeting
-
Following up.
1. Preparation
Key areas to be considered when
preparing for a meeting include:
-
Having a Clear Objective:
Make sure you and everyone else involved is fully aware of exactly
why the meeting is being held. What do want the outcome of the meeting
to be? If you are unsure of this aspect, the meeting is unlikely
to be fully effective - it may become extremely time consuming.
-
Being Fully Briefed:
Make sure you have done all your "homework". Have you collated all
the information you need? Are you fully aware of the facts? Are
they relevant and up-to-date? Time spent at this stage can save
embarrassment later!
-
Planning Key Points:
What key points do you want to cover during the meeting? Put together
the ‘bullet points’ that you want to cover. You cannot ‘script’
a meeting, but you can make sure that you have a logical progression
to the areas you want to address.
-
Anticipating Likely
Responses: You cannot ‘script’ a meeting, but you can anticipate
the likely responses you are going to encounter, and therefore you
can prepare some alternatives/options suited to those responses.
-
Arranging a Mutually
Convenient Date/Time/Location: This can be quite an ordeal,
especially if you have to coordinate a number of diaries! When considering
where to hold the meeting, think about whether it would be better
to meet on ‘neutral’ territory. Meeting on ‘your’ territory might
give you an ‘advantage.’ Going to ‘their’ territory might send messages
of your desire to be ‘cooperative.’
2. Opening
The three main steps to opening
a meeting are as follows:
-
Creating the Right
Impression/Atmosphere: First impressions are formed very quickly
(apparently within the first seven seconds of meeting someone!).
There is no second chance to create a good first impression; if
you ‘get it wrong’ it can take an awfully long time for someone
to change their initial opinion of you. Consider the following:
-
Think carefully about
what to wear (dress in a way that makes you part of the group, not
alien to it).
-
Keep handshakes firm,
not bone-crushing and eye contact direct not staring.
-
Keep any opening remarks
concise and non contentious.
-
Remember; smile (if appropriate)!
-
Setting the Agenda:
This does not necessarily have to be a formal affair, i.e., a lengthy
document that is circulated six weeks in advance, but some key points
about what is going to be covered during the meeting would be useful
for all concerned (not least, you - as a useful reminder of what
you want to cover).
-
Keeping an Open Mind:
If you are the one instigating a meeting and the agenda is ‘yours,’
you may be tempted into assuming that everything is going to go
your way. You will need to keep an open mind. Try not to attend
the meeting with too many preconceived ideas. Welcome and invite
the opinions of others. Contemplate points of view that are counter
to yours carefully – do not dismiss them too quickly.
3. Running the Meeting
Meetings constitute a more formal
mode of conversation, so you will need to practice the following skills
in order to ensure that the meeting is successful:
-
Asking appropriate questions
-
Listening actively
-
Keeping to the agenda
-
Keeping in control
-
Receiving information
with an open mind
-
Giving information honestly
-
Ensuring common understanding
-
Watching the time! (more
than two hours and the meeting is likely to be ineffective).
4. Closing the Meeting
When the meeting comes to its
close, the following should have been done:
-
The objective was achieved
-
The key points were summarized
and clarified
-
Action points were agreed
upon (what is to be done, by whom and when)
-
The time and place for
the next meeting, if appropriate, were agreed upon.
5. Following Up
The ending of a meeting is often
a beginning; once a meeting is over, the minutes of it should be recorded
as soon as possible, while salient points are still fresh in your mind.
Remember, the minutes DO NOT have to be a verbatim account of the meeting
itself. They need to reflect the key points discussed and, where appropriate,
highlight what was said by whom. Minutes should be circulated to those
who attended the meeting and other interested parties. Do not forget
to achieve all necessary action points in the time-scales agreed, and
take a few minutes to analyze the success (or otherwise!) of your meeting,
i.e., ask yourself what would you do differently (if anything) next
time round, and why?
Team Building
hen building and/or working
in teams one should be aware of the fact that people are different and
therefore also motivated in different ways; what motivates one person
does not necessarily motivate others. The following small exercise will
illustrate this:
Exercise: MOTIVATION
Choose your top five motivators
from the following list, and then compare with others (your colleagues,
group members etc.):
Key Motivators:
-
Achievement
-
Freedom of control
-
Recognition (appreciation,
credit)
-
Status (position, rank)
-
Salary
-
Responsibility for managing
others
-
Advancement (career progression)
-
Intrinsically satisfying
work
-
Being part of a team
-
Pleasant working conditions
-
Job security
-
Mobility
When building teams, the following
steps should be followed:
Team Development Spectrum
|
STAGE 1
|
STAGE 2
|
STAGE 3
|
STAGE 4
|
|
FORMING
Impersonal
Wary
Non-committal
Dependence on leader
Little exchange of information
"What shall we do?"
|
STORMING
Confronting people
Conflict strategies
Blockages
Conflict rebellion against the leader
Criticism
"It can't be done"
|
NORMING
Working through blockages
Establishing roles and procedures
Giving/receiving
feedback
Confronting issues
Group cohesion
Norms
Mutual support
"We can do it"
|
PERFORMING
Developing support
systems
Open
Versatile
Effective
Reviewing
Roles flexible
Express opinion
Trust
"We are doing it"
|
How to Gain the Most from
Working in a Group
A group of individuals who have
a task will usually approach it on the basis of their own styles and
preferred methods of working, without clarifying exactly how
they are going to go about the business of working together effectively
as a group. (A group being more than just a set of different and disparate
individuals!).
Groups that work together most
effectively usually have a clearly stated and understood method of working,
which they have discussed and agreed upon before tackling the task in
front of them. The approach outlined below is a guideline, and you may
wish to amend it, drawing upon each other's experience of working in
other groups.
You will probably find that
as you spend time together on different tasks and get to know one another
better your method will evolve. Once you have developed a clear approach
to working effectively together it is easy to adapt it to whatever task
you address. The method of working can be discussed and agreed upon
irrespective of the task.
Guidelines to a method of working
in groups include the following:
-
Understanding the
Task
Check that everyone in the
group understands what is being asked of them, and that all have the
same understanding of the task. Often a group will progress
a task only to find that people are working on different agendas,
and pulling in different directions. Sometimes this leads to a group
still struggling to understand the task having run out of time. Gaining
a clear and shared understanding of the task to begin with saves time.
-
Agreeing on the
Objective
Once the task requirements
have been understood the group can discuss and agree on the objective.
A reliable objective should
be:
S Specific
M Measurable
A Achievable
R Realistic
T Time orientated
If as a group you find that
you cannot meet an objective then it is maybe due to it being too
general or unrealistic within the time frame. It is important to review
the objectives as you go along to ensure you are on track.
-
Gather Information
and Share Resources
When as a group you are clear
as to the objective it is important to find out what, if any, other
information is needed and what resources are available within the
group by way of particular strengths and skills. It may also be useful
that this point to be clear about possible limitations of the group,
and/or areas of development for individuals.
-
Develop a Plan
Time spent on developing and
agreeing to a plan of action is never a waste of time - it will save
time spent on completing the task.
Many groups tend to be action-orientated
and leap into the task without thinking about it. Whilst the group
may successfully complete the task it is often through a last-minute
scramble, less effective decision-making, and non-inclusion of some
group members.
-
Review |