Syrian Interests and Role in
Lebanon
Dr. Volker Perthes
Lebanon is an important part of the Syrian policy. The Syrian
hegemony in Lebanon is due, in the main, to the Arab-Israeli
conflict and is a security issue.
Military-Political Relations
In 1976 Syria intervened in the Lebanese civil war. (Syria
introduced Al-Saiqa forces in 1975.) The Syrian army
engaged Israeli forces in 1978, and was dragged into
confrontation with them in 1982. The Syrians opposed the 17 May
1983 Lebanese-Israel agreement. Syria put pressure on the
Lebanese government and was able to influence its position. In
1987 Syrian troops re-entered West Beirut at the request of
different factions and managed to control the situation between
the warring factions, namely Amal against Hizballah, and Amal
against the Palestinians. Algeria, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia
intervened in 1989. The Taif Accord was signed with
Syrias consent. Syria opposed Colonel Auns forces,
and the Syrian forces managed to throw him out. The withdrawal of
the Syrian forces from Beirut to the Al-Biqaa Valley must
coincide with Israels withdrawal from its self-proclaimed
security zone.
There was a partial Syrian redeployment in August and September
of 1996, which was considered by the Israelis as an offensive
move. Lebanon interpreted this redeployment as part of the
Taef agreement. The actual strategic reason for
Syrias redeployment was to move more expensive equipment to
the Syrian side of the Syrian-Lebanese borders. The Lebanese
government showed that it could handle the situation as the
results of the elections were pro-Syrian, since anti-Syrian
members had been thrown out of the Parliament.
In April 1996 Israel attacked Lebanon in Operation Grapes
of Wrath. Syria participated in the formation of the ILMG
and in monitoring the rules of the April agreement, leaving no
doubt that Damascus remains the reference point of Lebanese
officials. Syria is not in a process of trying to annex Lebanon
as indicated in its response to Operation Grapes of
Wrath. Lebanon is vital to Syrias security as it
provides air space over Al-Biqaa.
Syria opposed the Lebanon First proposal because of
its motto of "one people in two states." Even though
there has been a declaration of cooperation and brotherhood
between Lebanon and Syria, the relationship remains unequal.
Syria will maintain Lebanons security, while Lebanon
ensures that it will not become a flank of attack against Syria.
Syria interferes mainly in Lebanons domestic policy.
Syria and Lebanon have signed several agreements such as the Free
Trade Agreement. This is in the interest of Lebanon because its
industry is far stronger than that of Syria, which still protects
its markets from an influx of Lebanese merchandise. The special
relationship continues for several reasons: some analysts
overlook the fact that special relations have their dynamics and
do not remain stagnant. Factors affecting the relationship
include the Arab-Israeli conflict and the domestic situation,
both in Lebanon and Syria.
The primary focus should be to get Syria to deliver; Lebanon is
secondary. If Israel pulls out of Lebanon, pressure from the US
and France will force Syria out of Lebanon for the following
reasons:
Israels withdrawal from South Lebanon will decrease the
need for Syrian troops as Hizballah will be disarmed.
Consequently, Lebanons internal stability will diminish the
threat to Syria.
Development in Lebanon will bring domestic stability, which will
give Syria more reasons to evacuate its forces from Lebanon.
Internal developments in Syria in the post-Assad era will require
the Syrian leadership to keep its elite units around Damascus
rather than Beirut. Economic concerns will take precedence over
the military in Syria. Consequently Syrian control over Lebanon
would be reduced.
Lebanon has a vital interest in maintaining good relations with
Syria. Lebanon will play a very important role in the
reconstruction and liberalization of the Syrian economy, and the
Lebanese banks will be at the forefront of the Arab banking
sector in Syria.