| PASSIA Meetings & Workshops | ![]() |
| Home > Dialogue Program >2004 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :: Dr Woodall’s Talk |
The
speaker began by outlining his professional background, some
of the projects he had been involved with in the past and how
he had come to be interested in the situation in Palestine .
He described how he had been asked to go to Croatia by
the United Nations in the early 1990's to investigate the psychological
impact of the conflict. He met women who had suffered horrendous
abuse in the so-called ‘rape camps' and helped to establish a
working group (the ‘Resilient Responses to Social Crisis' group)
back at Harvard to investigate the traumatic effects of such
violence and how they can be dealt with.
Following the attack on the World Trade Center in New York , Dr Woodall was asked by the City of New York to develop programs that would help New Yorkers, especially children, come to terms with what had happened and help them deal with their anger and fear in less damaging ways. Dr Woodall cited the statistic that ‘hate crimes' in the United States had increased by 1700% following the September 11 th attacks, an example of how psychological trauma can lead to destructive social phenomena.
Dr Woodall's conclusion from his experiences in the Balkans and New York was that large-scale psychological trauma caused by conflict situations cannot be dealt with on an individual level, by treating each victim separately. Rather it is necessary to consider a broader approach one which encompasses three distinct aspects, a political aspect (i.e. the need for a political solution/remedy), a social aspect (i.e. the need to address problems at the level of the society as a whole) and thirdly a psychological aspect.
In other words post-traumatic psychological problems can only be satisfactorily addressed by tackling their political and social causes, and conversely, a successful peace initiative must take into account psychosocial factors (perhaps the ‘Truth' commissions established in post-Apartheid South Africa are a good example of this). Dr Woodall was critical of attempts to define individual reactions to traumatic events within a purely medical framework, e.g. by describing them as instances of a particular disorder or syndrome such as ‘Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder' (PTSD). In his view this fails to capture the wide-ranging social, political, economic, religious etc. dimensions of catastrophic events that all have an impact on the psychological state of an individual and influence their ability to cope with what has happened to them.
One of the major consequences of traumatic conflict situations is that individuals become alienated or detached from themselves and feel unable to deal with strong emotions. Fear, terror and rage become overwhelming and lead to worries that one is losing ones humanity. Hence violence can be dehumanizing not just because the acts of violence themselves strip away individual dignity and self-respect, but also because the emotions they produce can lead to those individuals believing that they are no longer ‘normal'.
In the post 9/11 environment in the United States , widespread fear and anger translated into an extreme and rigid form of nationalism that regarded dissent as ‘unpatriotic' or ‘un-American' (a phenomenon which has undoubtedly benefited the Bush Administration). The projects which Dr Woodall is engaged with in New York City are designed to try and prevent or limit the effects of such destructive social tendencies.
Dr
Woodall hoped that by coming to Palestine he
would be able to offer insights into the kinds of structures
or initiatives might be required to help Palestinians overcome
the psychological trauma they have endured as a result of the
conflict.
One
question asked of Dr Woodall was, “is Palestine a
fundamentally different kind of conflict”? Many participants
expressed the view that the nature of the conflict in Palestine is
unique. The Israelis have succeeded in total collective punishment
that encompasses every single individual in Palestine making
the suffering comprehensive and absolute. In addition the conflict
seems to be without end, and few people have any confidence in
the notion that peace will be achievable in the near future,
producing widespread feelings of despair and powerlessness.
Dr Woodall agreed that the Israel/Palestine conflict appears intractable and there often seems to be little, if any, grounds for optimism. However a possible way forward is to look for individual and collective strengths and seek to enhance or promote them, and to try and build a sense of unity around shared values.
The participants raised a number of further points:
The above points serve to highlight the major problems affecting Palestinians at both an individual and a social level. The nature of the conflict and Israeli actions and the lack of any genuine desire on the part of the Israelis to seriously address Palestinian concerns makes attempts to achieve peace seem futile and pointless. In this kind of climate, participants wondered what impact projects such as those Dr Woodall has worked on in the past could have.
Dr Woodall closed the session by agreeing again that prospects seemed bleak and felt that only by the imposition of an outside military force to separate the two sides, would there be any hope of a peaceful settlement. He argued that Palestinians and Israelis are not capable of reaching an agreement unaided and require external pressure to do so. At the same time, there is a definite lack of political will in the international community to provide such pressure.
| Print this page |
|
PASSIA
MEETINGS |