|
Arab
Jerusalem Rehabilitation Program
The Project
Ever since 1967, the Israeli government
has encouraged Jews to settle in East Jerusalem by providing incentives
such as favorable apartment purchase terms, subsidies, and exemption
from municipal taxes in order to secure a long-term Jewish majority
in the city. Palestinian Jerusalemites, meanwhile, have been subject
to restrictive residency and housing policies, aiming at separating
them from the Palestinians in the West Bank and driving them out
of the city, and have witnessed the confiscation of their land
for the construction or expansion of Israeli settlements.
These settlements form
two rings around the city - the inner ring in East Jerusalem and
the outer ring (‘Greater Jerusalem’) reaching far into the West
Bank - isolating Arab East Jerusalem, cutting the West Bank in
half, and imposing economic strangulation as the city is the natural
center for all trade and movement routes in the Palestinian Territories.
Today, six years after the signing of the first Oslo Accords,
Arab Jerusalem is facing an increasingly critical situation and
the prospects to recover it as the Palestinian future capital
in more than just a symbolic sense are decreasing dramatically.
The overall goal and
purpose of the project presented here was to examine ways and
means to ensure and shape a viable future for Arab Jerusalem and
to provide local communities with technical and organizational
counsel in formulating and implementing local developmental strategies
to this end. The project focused on an outline for the rehabilitation
of Arab Jerusalem local communities and drew various scenarios
of what can be done and what will happen if nothing will be done.
The following maps
shall illustrate this in a simplified manner: the left map shows
Jerusalem according to the current situation, the map in the center
suggests an outline for the rehabilitation of Arab East Jerusalem
focussing on the connection of the hinterland, and the map to
the right shows the situation that will most likely result in
the event of failing to deliver such an outline. It should be
noted here that since PASSIA’s seeks to represent a viable option
for the rehabilitation of Arab neighborhoods, it focuses on suggestions
that do NOT prejudice the current urban prospects as imposed by
Israel.

purple = Israeli
West Jerusalem blue = Israeli settlement
red = Arab Jerusalem
neighborhoods light orange = urban periphery (Bethlehem,
Ramallah)
dark orange (middle
map) = suggested outline for rehabilitation
The project’s crucial
core was the establishment of a database on the socioeconomic
situation and physical infrastructure from which vital information
could be drawn to enable drafting and assessing urban development
and regeneration policies. In order to explore the feasibility
of such a comprehensive project PASSIA conducted a pilot
project to evaluate methods and results for local community-involved
planning. PASSIA commissioned Land Use Planning and Documentation
Consultant Jan de Jong to undertake a baseline survey for a pilot
area, comprising northeastern East Jerusalem (Anata, Hizma, Az-Za’im,
‘Isawiyya, and Shu’fat Refugee Camp), and to create a Developmental
Constraint and Potential Inventory, using aerial photography,
topo-cadastral maps, terrain exploration and statistics, for one
local community (Anata).
The compilation of
the database was not an easy task given the lack of reliable data
and detailed up-to-date information on the Palestinian neighborhoods
in East Jerusalem and a Palestinian local administration, which
must operate without standardized guidelines for civil administration,
including creating and keeping municipal records. There is, for
instance, no full registry of local citizens – the backbone for
whatever developmental planning -, there is none other than the
simplest of cadastral registration (without a record of transactions);
there are no records on the maintenance of public facilities,
of public health, employment, household income, etc. What the
PASSIA pilot project was able to collect only came after an extraordinary
effort of project staff and local residents.
From its outset, the
project promoted a citizen-oriented ‘bottom-up’ approach,
involving representatives from the local community (i.e., Anata)
in the various stages and tasks of the project, including fieldwork
and data compilation. The designs of previous development initiatives
are striking in their keeping a disturbing distance from the concerned
population, whereas the approach here produced highly practical
and applicable information and valuable feedback on various development
options. At the same time, awareness among the residents was raised
with regard to both the status quo (including Israeli future
plans) and options how to deal with the given situation.
Out of the compiled
information a profile of developmental needs and constraints was
generated and visualized in the form of theme-maps, which allow
for the exploration of the prospects and options for local community
development both thematically and in detail. The set of maps outlines
selected features such as housing and other socioeconomic conditions
(e.g., household, members, household-set-up date, kind of residence/dwelling,
rented or owned, full or shared land property, garden, sewage,
electricity, household amenities); availability of services, infrastructure
and public facilities (maintenance, sewerage, power supply, roads,
greenery, water supply, schools, clinics, chambers of commerce,
etc.), land issues (land use, resource and ownership, land zoning
schemes, and land categories), development constraints and potentials,
cultural-historical sites, and the impact of nearby Israeli settlements.
One option featured
and illustrated is the so-called ‘null-option’, i.e., the likely
situation in 15 years time, if no decisions are taken on the examined
points and identified current trends (such as deterioration of
living conditions, overcrowding, decrease of socioeconomic capacity,
pauperization, environmental hazards, etc.).
The findings allow
to answer questions such as what is the pressure on housing capacity,
how much additional living space is needed, how much is enabled
by the authorities, how much is really set aside? What pressures
can be recognized on amenities such as green spaces, or on cultural-historical
sites and characteristic traditional architecture? What communal
private and public space is left accessible to citizens on account
of official zoning plans? What access to socioeconomic resources
is enabled on account of plans for neighboring communities or
of adjacent land use schemes (nature reserves, combat training
zones, Israeli settlements, etc.).
With providing such
an elementary information tool that can be used and viewed by
citizens, local councilors, institutions, etc., the project hopes
to facilitate municipal-level decision taking and mobilize civil
self-initiative in protecting and restoring Arab Jerusalemite
neighborhoods. Furthermore, based on the findings of the pilot
project, recommendations for development needs, possibilities
and priorities can be made, which could become a yet unavailable
but invaluable source for both the local population and potential
funders.
The pilot project was
kindly co-funded by the Canada Fund for Local Initiatives, Ramallah,
and the British Consulate (Small Grants Scheme), Jerusalem.
|